Merrimac at a glance
7,423
People
$1,388,000
Median sale
$825/wk
Median rent
3.09%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 10 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
$610,000
Last sold
13 Aug 2020
4
Bedrooms
3
Bathrooms
3
Car spaces
658 m²
Land
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$610,000
13 Aug 2020 · derived via latest_sale
Local land rate: recorded House sales in Merrimac (last 5 years) with land size have a median of $2,007/m² of land (n=39). Districts calculation from recorded sales — not a valuation.
Merrimac at a glance
7,423
People
$1,388,000
Median sale
$825/wk
Median rent
3.09%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 10 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs Merrimac
-56.1%
Median sale
Suburb $1,388,000
+3.94 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 3.09%
Suburb median $1,388,000 from 10 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning scheme
City Plan
Zone
Low density residential
Low density residential
Jurisdiction
City of Gold Coast
Gold Coast, QLD
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
For more information on this property, visit Queensland Globe.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
QLDZoned Low density residential (City Plan). Official parcel area about 660 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $825/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
3 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownmediumZoned Low density residential (City Plan). Official parcel area about 660 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumOfficial parcel about 660 m² — land size can look like optionality. No material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Merrimac at a glance
7,423
People
$1,388,000
Median sale
$825/wk
Median rent
3.09%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 10 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Place AscotIn a quiet cul de sac close to great schools and the Robina Town Centre shopping centre, this substantial home has been given the full family stamp of approval!
Inside this sprawling home the four bedrooms are conveniently spread across both levels, with the master boasting a large walk-in-robe and ensuite. A generously-proportioned separate lounge adds further options; the open-plan kitchen is a highly functional space with an abundance of storage, and versatile formal and informal living areas ensure the ability to cater to any and every occasion.
Simplicity is the key outside, with the sun-soaked deck and the manicured lawn creating an environment where families of all shapes and sizes can thrive. The sturdy garage is an added bonus, while an abundance of off-street parking completes the appeal.
Situated at the end of a quiet cul-de-sac, the property is located just metres from All saints Anglican School and within easy reach of everything from the railway station and the motorway to the array of shops and amenities on offer at Robina Town Centre.
The popular location, the proximity to amenities and the easy-care nature of this very tidy home combine to create a very enticing package indeed! Interest will be high - contact us now for more information.
Listing description written by Nicholas Loftus, Place Ascot — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.