Ridgehaven at a glance
4,293
People
$900,000
Median sale
$582/wk
Median rent
3.36%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 17 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
SA › Ridgehaven › Shepherd St
$915,000
Last sold
19 Mar 2026
3
Bedrooms
2
Bathrooms
2
Car spaces
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$915,000
19 Mar 2026 · derived via latest_sale
Ridgehaven at a glance
4,293
People
$900,000
Median sale
$582/wk
Median rent
3.36%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 17 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs Ridgehaven
+1.7%
Median sale
Suburb $900,000
-0.05 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 3.36%
Suburb median $900,000 from 17 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning scheme
Planning and Design Code
Zone
General Neighbourhood
GN
Jurisdiction
Tea Tree Gully
Tea Tree Gully, SA
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
SAZoned General Neighbourhood · GN (Planning and Design Code). Official parcel area about 702 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Street frontage and true lot geometry are not confirmed without open cadastre. Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $582/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
3 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownlowZoned General Neighbourhood · GN (Planning and Design Code). Official parcel area about 702 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumOfficial parcel about 702 m² — land size can look like optionality. No material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Ridgehaven at a glance
4,293
People
$900,000
Median sale
$582/wk
Median rent
3.36%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 17 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Bruse Real EstateSo stylish. So secure. Such a delight to offer this new family home for sale.
Built by a boutique builder who takes pride in their work.
You will love the colour pallette. A mix of modern yet warm tones. The home has a great feel about it.
Double lock up garage plus a third carpark to the side of the home for a caravan or 3rd car. Very rare!
Single level in a private group of only 2 homes.
The driveway is owned by both homes so both will only share the public liability insurance over the driveway. The homes have completely separate construction.
Impressive and very generous open plan living room, Large enough to accommodate big furniture pieces.
The hub of the internal home flows seamlessly out to a spacious North facing undercover outdoor alfresco area further to a good size back lawn and garden area. Easy care and perfect for children to play.
Main bedroom suite complete with walk in robe and a luxurious ensuite bathroom.
Bedrooms 2 & 3 both include built in robes and are adjacent the sparkling second bathroom.
Large separate laundry with direct access outside.
North facing backyard.
Floor to ceiling tiling to bathrooms
Ducted reverse cycle airconditioning with zone control
Ceiling fan to main living room
Solid stone benchtops
Gas cooktop, electric oven, dishwasher
LED downlights
Stylish tapware
Excellent storage throughout
Landscaped gardens
and much more.
First home buyers can take advantage of the $15k FHOG and pay no stramp duty STCC.
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Certificate of Title
Volume 6283 Folio 113
Council
City of Tea Tree Gully
Land Size
331sqm plus driveway
School Zoning
Modbury Primary School
The Heights School
Listing description written by Theon Bruse, Bruse Real Estate — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.