Mount Warren Park at a glance
5,964
People
$940,000
Median sale
$571/wk
Median rent
3.16%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 40 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
QLD › Mount Warren Park › Paisley Ct
$853,000
Last sold
11 Feb 2026
3
Bedrooms
1
Bathrooms
1
Car spaces
499 m²
Land
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$853,000
11 Feb 2026 · derived via latest_sale
Local land rate: recorded House sales in Mount Warren Park (last 5 years) with land size have a median of $1,080/m² of land (n=129). Districts calculation from recorded sales — not a valuation.
Mount Warren Park at a glance
5,964
People
$940,000
Median sale
$571/wk
Median rent
3.16%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 40 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs Mount Warren Park
-9.3%
Median sale
Suburb $940,000
+0.32 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 3.16%
Suburb median $940,000 from 40 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning scheme
Logan Planning Scheme 2015
Zone
Low Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Jurisdiction
Logan City Council
Logan, QLD
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
For more information on this property, visit Queensland Globe.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
QLDZoned Low Density Residential (Logan Planning Scheme 2015). Official parcel area about 500 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $571/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
3 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownmediumZoned Low Density Residential (Logan Planning Scheme 2015). Official parcel area about 500 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumNo material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Mount Warren Park at a glance
5,964
People
$940,000
Median sale
$571/wk
Median rent
3.16%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 40 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Tony Pennisi The Property HubWelcome to 14 Paisley Court Mount Warren Park. This Charming home is offered to the market for the very first time ever. Many boxes will be ticked for a variety of buyers being homeowners or investors alike looking for a tastefully updated, low maintenance property with nothing left to do. Nestled away in a quiet cul de sac, within walking distance to Shops, Schools and sporting facilities, you won't want to miss this one, it won't last long!
Featuring:
• 3 Bedrooms with robs
• 3 way bathroom offering separate Shower/Vanity/Toilet
• Open plan living/dining/family room
• Study/Office space
• Modern kitchen with loads of bench space
• Fully tiled living areas
• Air Conditioned throughout
• Undercover entertainment
• Landscaped gardens
• Fully fenced low maintenance 499sqm block
• Single carport
Mount Warren Park is located midway between Brisbane and the Gold Coast offering easy access to M1, Logan motorway and Express trains to CBD. Local Schools, Shops and Sporting facilities are all within walking distance from this property.
Whilst we endeavour to represent this property information to the best of our knowledge and belief, and have no reason to doubt any inaccuracy, this information has been provided to us by the property owner and we therefore accept no responsibility and disclaim all liability in respect to any errors, omissions, inaccuracies or misstatements in any information. We encourage buyers to make their own enquiries and refer you to the due diligence checklist provided by Consumer Affairs for further information.
Listing description written by Linda McCabe, Tony Pennisi The Property Hub — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.