Orchard Hills at a glance
1,908
People
$865,000
Median sale
$797/wk
Median rent
4.79%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 6 recorded sales (last 24 months) — a Districts calculation.
NSW › Orchard Hills › Verdelho Way
4
Bedrooms
2
Bathrooms
5
Car spaces
5,329 m²
Land
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
No verification items generated for this record.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
No recorded sale price for this property yet.
Local land rate: recorded House sales in Orchard Hills (last 5 years) with land size have a median of $711/m² of land (n=3). Districts calculation from recorded sales — not a valuation.
Orchard Hills at a glance
1,908
People
$865,000
Median sale
$797/wk
Median rent
4.79%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 6 recorded sales (last 24 months) — a Districts calculation.
Planning
Planning scheme
Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010
Zone
Primary Production Small Lots
RU4
Jurisdiction
Penrith
Penrith, NSW
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
The official layer was queried and no heritage listed area was detected on this parcel (NSW ePlanning Spatial Viewer, retrieved 31 Aug 2026). Mapped layers change — this is the strongest all-clear Districts can give, not a certificate.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
NSWZoned Primary Production Small Lots · RU4 (Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010). Official parcel area about 5,343 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. NSW has a statewide DA API. Nearby (100–800 m) applications are not loaded for this property yet.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $797/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. NSW has a statewide DA API. Nearby (100–800 m) applications are not loaded for this property yet. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. NSW net yield needs land tax and VG inputs that are not loaded. Gross yield from listings is not net yield.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
3 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownmediumZoned Primary Production Small Lots · RU4 (Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010). Official parcel area about 5,343 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNSW has a statewide DA API. Nearby (100–800 m) applications are not loaded for this property yet.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumOfficial parcel about 5,343 m² — land size can look like optionality. No material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownNSW Valuer General land values are not loaded for this property yet.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNSW net yield needs land tax and VG inputs that are not loaded. Gross yield from listings is not net yield.
Area
Orchard Hills at a glance
1,908
People
$865,000
Median sale
$797/wk
Median rent
4.79%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 6 recorded sales (last 24 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Ray White Nepean Group PenrithSet on approx 5,329sqm's of beautiful landscape giving you your very own botanic style garden, covering all the four seasons, this would be a bride's dream setting for a garden wedding.
The home offers plenty of room for the whole family with a formal lounge and dining, study with external entry, an open plan family dining off the kitchen, that has spectacular views over your garden. Offering 4 large bedrooms with built-ins to all and master with an en-site and walk-in robe. Relax and unwind around the pool and enjoy time with family and friends around the BBQ and entertainment areas.
There is plenty of space with a double garage under the main roof with internal access and there is plenty of side access to get the caravan, boat or trailer to the oversized 3 car garage / man shed with bar or work space area to the rear of the block. There is so much more to see and explore.
Call today to book your personal inspection - Grahaem on 0404 475 550.
Features:
- 4 large bedrooms with built-ins and fans
- Main with ensuite and walk in robe
- Study with external access
- 3rd toilet downstairs
- Double car garage with internal access
- Large side access to rear of the property
- Oversized 3 car barn style garage with workshop space / man cave
- Solar
- Beautifully manicured gardens with pond
- Set in a cul-de-sac location
- Great entertainment and BBQ area
- Multiple entertainment areas
- Perfect for a garden wedding
- In ground pool with spa and cave
Listing description written by Grahaem Evans, Ray White Nepean Group Penrith — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.
Also look at