Hughes at a glance
3,159
People
$1,260,000
Median sale
$400/wk
Median rent
1.65%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 5 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
$1,650,000
Last sold
11 Apr 2022
4
Bedrooms
2
Bathrooms
2
Car spaces
803 m²
Land
170 m²
Building
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$1,650,000
11 Apr 2022 · derived via latest_sale
Local land rate: recorded House sales in Hughes (last 5 years) with land size have a median of $1,588/m² of land (n=15). Districts calculation from recorded sales — not a valuation.
Hughes at a glance
3,159
People
$1,260,000
Median sale
$400/wk
Median rent
1.65%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 5 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs Hughes
+31.0%
Median sale
Suburb $1,260,000
-0.39 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 1.65%
Suburb median $1,260,000 from 5 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning scheme
HUGHES
Zone
RZ1
RZ1
Jurisdiction
Unincorporated ACT
Unincorporated ACT, ACT
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
ACTZoned RZ1 (HUGHES). Official parcel area about 805 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. Nearby development applications are not loaded for this property.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $400/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded for this property. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
3 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownmediumZoned RZ1 (HUGHES). Official parcel area about 805 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded for this property.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. This jurisdiction has no comparable official bond series in the free set.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumOfficial parcel about 805 m² — land size can look like optionality. No material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Hughes at a glance
3,159
People
$1,260,000
Median sale
$400/wk
Median rent
1.65%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 5 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Hayman PartnersSited on an expansive 803m2 block with RZ2 zoning and a 21 metre frontage (approx).
This sensational family home in a prime location in Hughes has reluctantly hit the market, 15 Glynn Street Hughes provides a dream location to walk to the shops, walk to public transport, schools and close proximity to the Hospitals. Access to arterial roads - heading North or South - Glynn Street is located to give you all access.
Four bedroom, two bathroom home - Outside and inside living, flexibility to adapt to your needs, enjoy the wonderful front and backyard areas or the undercover entertaining, this beautiful block also has laneway access to the backyard for the buyer to utilise the large open space.
Well looked after for many years, pergola out the rear of property for covered comfort, wrap around deck at the front off the home for those sundrenched afternoons.
The access from laneway could cater for a caravan, camper trailer or just basic access, gardens are easy care and this property has not been offered for sale before.
This is an opportunity not to be missed by any potential buyer wanting to move into Hughes.
803m2 RZ2 Block in the heart of Hughes
Rental Appraisal $825 - $850 per week
FEATURES:
4 Bedrooms / 2 Bathrooms
Ducted gas heating
Evaporative cooling
Pergola at rear
Wrap around deck at front & entry
Laneway access - double gates
Secure fencing
Large backyard
Easy care gardens
Desired location
WHAT THE VENDORS LOVE:
1. Prime location - central to everything
2. Proximity to Hospitals, Red Hill Nature Reserve and Federal Golf Course
3. Sunny northern aspect in a lovely leafy suburb
4. Easy access to all arterial roads
STATISTICS:
RZ2 - 21m frontage
Block 5
Section 412
Land: 803m2
Land Value: $822,000
Rates: $5,488
Land tax: $8,671
Living: 170m2
Garage: 29m2
Carport: 25m2
Construction: 1964
Listing description written by Glen Kingston, Hayman Partners — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.