Woodend at a glance
1,516
People
$970,000
Median sale
$487/wk
Median rent
2.61%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 11 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
$685,000
Last sold
29 Apr 2025
3
Bedrooms
1
Bathrooms
2
Car spaces
604 m²
Land
Districts View
No upside evidence detected in the data Districts holds for this lot.
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$685,000
29 Apr 2025 · derived via latest_sale
Sources disagree on the sale price. All recorded figures are shown in the history below — Districts does not pick a winner.
Local land rate: recorded House sales in Woodend (last 5 years) with land size have a median of $986/m² of land (n=76). Districts calculation from recorded sales — not a valuation.
Woodend at a glance
1,516
People
$970,000
Median sale
$487/wk
Median rent
2.61%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 11 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs Woodend
-29.4%
Median sale
Suburb $970,000
+1.09 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 2.61%
Suburb median $970,000 from 11 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning data unavailable for this jurisdiction (no_adapter:QLD)
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
For more information on this property, visit Queensland Globe.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
QLDZoning is not available (no_adapter). A suburb median or growth rate is not a reason this particular lot would outperform. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Official flood overlay has not been retrieved (no_adapter). Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $487/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
1 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
UnknownZoning is not available (no_adapter).
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
UnknownThe constraint stack has not been retrieved for this lot, so Districts cannot explain a discount versus land size.
Lot-level flood
UnknownOfficial flood overlay has not been retrieved (no_adapter). Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Woodend at a glance
1,516
People
$970,000
Median sale
$487/wk
Median rent
2.61%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 11 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Jason McNamara Property16 Panton Street, Woodend—a home rich in history and character. Believed to date back to the 1870s, this property is thought to have once served as the local post office, adding to its charm and significance.
One of the most striking features of this home is its incredible timber craftsmanship. The ceiling timbers are some of the widest I’ve ever seen—the only other places I’ve come across timber like this are in grand 1860s-era homes such as *Notnel* and *Toronto*. This level of detail is a rare find and speaks to the home's historic quality.
The property it does present an opportunity for a new owner to restore and enhance its beauty. The roof has some surface rust but remains fully functional, keeping the home dry and protected. With a little vision, this could be a truly special piece of Ipswich’s history.
Property Features:
3 Bedrooms + Study – Well-sized rooms with plenty of natural light
1 Bathroom - Recently renovated
Recently renovated Kitchen
Rewired
New plumbing throughout
New Hot water System
New gutters
Spacious Living & Dining Areas – High ceilings, VJ walls, and polished timber floors
Heritage Timber Features– Including extra-wide ceiling boards rarely seen outside of 1860s-era homes
Air Conditioning & Ceiling Fans
Solar System
Remote-Controlled Gates & 2 Street Access
Fully Fenced 604m² Block
Under-House Parking & Storage
– Concreted area with space for two vehicles
Prime Location:
Believed to be the original post office for the area (Never let the truth get in the way of a good story)
Walking distance to Ipswich Grammar, St Mary’s, and St Edmund’s
Minutes from Ipswich CBD, cafes, and Riverlink Shopping Centre
Easy access to parks, river walks, and transport links
15 minute walk to Ipswich Station.
INVESTORS: Rent Approx. $600 p/w
This is a rare opportunity to own a potential piece of Ipswich’s past, with the charm of history and the chance to add your own touch. If you appreciate heritage homes with character, 16 Panton Street is well worth an inspection.
Contact Jason today to arrange a viewing!
Listing description written by Jason McNamara, Jason McNamara Property — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.