Gulfview Heights at a glance
3,618
People
$905,000
Median sale
$579/wk
Median rent
3.33%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 9 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
SA › Gulfview Heights › Cordoba Ave
$464,000
Last sold
7 June 2023
0
Bedrooms
0
Bathrooms
0
Car spaces
678 m²
Land
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$464,000
7 June 2023 · derived via latest_sale
Gulfview Heights at a glance
3,618
People
$905,000
Median sale
$579/wk
Median rent
3.33%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 9 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs Gulfview Heights
-48.7%
Median sale
Suburb $905,000
+3.16 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 3.33%
Suburb median $905,000 from 9 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning scheme
Planning and Design Code
Zone
Hills Neighbourhood
HN
Jurisdiction
Salisbury
Salisbury, SA
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
SAZoned Hills Neighbourhood · HN (Planning and Design Code). Official parcel area about 679 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Street frontage and true lot geometry are not confirmed without open cadastre. Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $579/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms. No recorded off-street parking — often a discount versus the suburb median for the same beds.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
3 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownlowZoned Hills Neighbourhood · HN (Planning and Design Code). Official parcel area about 679 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumOfficial parcel about 679 m² — land size can look like optionality. No material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Gulfview Heights at a glance
3,618
People
$905,000
Median sale
$579/wk
Median rent
3.33%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 9 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Ray White Para HillsUnleash your imagination and build the home of your dreams on this exceptional 678m2 (approx.) land with an outstanding frontage of 18m (approx.) vacant land at 1c Cordoba Avenue in the sought-after Gulfview Heights. Situated in a tranquil and picturesque location, this property offers the perfect canvas for you to create your own personal sanctuary, all on a generous allotment of 678m2 (approx.).
Features you will love:
• The outstanding location is both convenient yet tranquil
• Generous allotment of 678m2 with a good frontage of 18m (approx.)
• Flexible design options for building
• Surrounded by other quality homes
The location of 1c Cordoba Avenue, Gulfview Heights offers the perfect blend of convenience and accessibility, ensuring that you have easy access to essential amenities and transport options right at your doorstep. The area is well-served by public transport, providing convenient commuting options for residents. Bus stops are located within walking distance of 1c Cordoba Avenue, allowing for easy access to nearby suburbs and connecting you to wider transportation networks. The property is also located centrally to fantastic public and private schools such as; Gulfview Heights Primary School, Keller Road, Primary, Para Hills School, King's Baptist Grammar School and just a short drive to Gleeson College and Pedare College, your family will be spoilt for choice when it comes to schooling.
Contact Brijesh Mishra for further information.
RLA 326570
* site plan is indicative only
Listing description written by Brijesh Mishra, Ray White Para Hills — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.