Woody Point at a glance
5,219
People
$1,170,000
Median sale
$569/wk
Median rent
2.53%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 55 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
QLD › Woody Point › Hardiman St
$1,170,000
Last sold
29 Apr 2026
6
Bedrooms
3
Bathrooms
3
Car spaces
405 m²
Land
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$1,170,000
29 Apr 2026 · derived via latest_sale
Woody Point at a glance
5,219
People
$1,170,000
Median sale
$569/wk
Median rent
2.53%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 55 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs Woody Point
0.0%
Median sale
Suburb $1,170,000
0.00 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 2.53%
Suburb median $1,170,000 from 55 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning scheme
MBRC Planning Scheme
Zone
General residential
Next generation neighbourhood
Jurisdiction
Moreton Bay Regional Council
Moreton Bay, QLD
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
For more information on this property, visit Queensland Globe.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
QLDZoned General residential · Next generation neighbourhood (MBRC Planning Scheme). Official parcel area about 406 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $569/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
3 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownmediumZoned General residential · Next generation neighbourhood (MBRC Planning Scheme). Official parcel area about 406 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumNo material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Nearby
Area
Woody Point at a glance
5,219
People
$1,170,000
Median sale
$569/wk
Median rent
2.53%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 55 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Ray White Woody PointA mere 400m from waterfront parklands, sandy beach and uninterrupted views of the islands is this multi-income stream coastal investment. With strong growth already and renovation upside, this three-flat property on a single 405sq m block is a smart, quiet achiever as a long-term land hold.
Currently returning $58,500 per annum, there is great potential to value-add given some work is required. Two of the three flats have been partially updated already, and they all each offer two bedrooms, one bathroom, an open-plan living/dining/kitchen, laundry, and parking for a vehicle. As a post-war property, redevelopment is also a lucrative consideration (STCA).
The location is superb, being east of Oxley Avenue and close not only to the water, but also to public transport and shops. It's also just 25 minutes to Brisbane Airport.
22 Hardiman St, Woody Point includes, but is not limited to:
- Triple-income coastal investment metres from the waterfront, east of Oxley Ave
- 405sq m block, approximately 11m frontage, 36.9m depth
- Returning $58,500 per annum, required work provides opportunity to add value
- Three flats, each with two bedrooms, one bathroom, open-plan living, parking
- Post-war allowing for redevelopment (STCA), or hold for a passive income
- Walk to Scotts Point Beach, waterfront parks, bus services and cafes
- Only 25 minutes to Brisbane Airport, within 4km of central Redcliffe
* Disclaimer - We have made our best endeavours to provide accurate information. We accept no responsibility for any errors or admissions. Buyers are encouraged to do their own research
Listing description written by Damien Misso, Ray White Woody Point — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.