Littlehampton at a glance
3,995
People
$942,000
Median sale
$592/wk
Median rent
3.27%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 21 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
SA › Littlehampton › Cowan Ave
3
Bedrooms
2
Bathrooms
2
Car spaces
945 m²
Land
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
No recorded sale price for this property yet.
Local land rate: recorded House sales in Littlehampton (last 5 years) with land size have a median of $1,082/m² of land (n=63). Districts calculation from recorded sales — not a valuation.
Littlehampton at a glance
3,995
People
$942,000
Median sale
$592/wk
Median rent
3.27%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 21 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Planning
Planning scheme
Planning and Design Code
Zone
Neighbourhood
N
Jurisdiction
Mount Barker
Mount Barker, SA
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
SAZoned Neighbourhood (Planning and Design Code). Official parcel area about 947 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Street frontage and true lot geometry are not confirmed without open cadastre. Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $592/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
3 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownlowZoned Neighbourhood (Planning and Design Code). Official parcel area about 947 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumOfficial parcel about 947 m² — land size can look like optionality. No material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Littlehampton at a glance
3,995
People
$942,000
Median sale
$592/wk
Median rent
3.27%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 21 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by LJ Hooker Mount BarkerIn a warm, friendly neighbourhood this impressive home stands tall on the high side of a quiet, tree lined street.
Beautifully upgraded home including freshly painted throughout, new carpets in all the bedrooms plus stylish, new modern flooring in the living areas and kitchen. There are two beautiful leadlight doors, new window treatments, plus the majority of the lighting has also been replaced with energy efficient down lighting and feature lights.
Open plan kitchen and meals area with the kitchen providing amble bench space, breakfast bar and a walk-in pantry.
The separate main living area provides more than enough space to split into 2 zones with your everyday lounge and TV watching while the second zone could be study area so you can oversee the children doing their homework.
Head upstairs to your own oasis being the master suite with walk-in robe, ensuite and the master bedroom big enough for a king size bed, side tables and chairs so you and your partner can sit and enjoy a cup of coffee, read or just sit back and relax in peace and quiet.
The children's bedrooms are a good size and serviced by the main bathroom with vanity, shower, bathtub and separate toilet.
Step outside and there's roughly 945m2 with established gardens, lawn areas and pergola to provide a shady place to enjoy summer evenings and BBQs.
Year round comfort is ensured with ducted reverse cycle air conditioning throughout. There is also a double garage with internal entry.
Situated in the highly sought Spring Park Farm and set amongst other quality homes this would be one you would be proud to own and show your friends and family.
A property well worth your inspection!
Listing description written by Phil Chapman, LJ Hooker Mount Barker — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.