Redwood Park at a glance
5,413
People
$852,500
Median sale
$616/wk
Median rent
3.76%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 16 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
SA › Redwood Park › Gaylard Cres
$725,000
Last sold
4 Nov 2023
4
Bedrooms
2
Bathrooms
2
Car spaces
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$725,000
4 Nov 2023 · derived via latest_sale
Redwood Park at a glance
5,413
People
$852,500
Median sale
$616/wk
Median rent
3.76%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 16 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs Redwood Park
-15.0%
Median sale
Suburb $852,500
+0.66 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 3.76%
Suburb median $852,500 from 16 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning scheme
Planning and Design Code
Zone
General Neighbourhood
GN
Jurisdiction
Tea Tree Gully
Tea Tree Gully, SA
Not detected
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
SAZoned General Neighbourhood · GN (Planning and Design Code). Official parcel area about 721 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Street frontage and true lot geometry are not confirmed without open cadastre. Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $616/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
4 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownlowZoned General Neighbourhood · GN (Planning and Design Code). Official parcel area about 721 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumOfficial parcel about 721 m² — land size can look like optionality. No material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
KnownmediumNo development applications were returned for this parcel. That is not a statement about nearby lots.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Redwood Park at a glance
5,413
People
$852,500
Median sale
$616/wk
Median rent
3.76%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 16 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Belle Property NorwoodSoak up peaceful views and abundant space while you make yourself at home in the comfort of a well-designed four-bedroom solid brick family home on an elevated 719sqm allotment.
From the era that defined light-filled, high-ceilinged homes with multiple living spaces, this striking eighties' residence basks in the airy vibe afforded by raked ceilings and exposed timber beams with living, dining and family spaces surrounding a central kitchen.
Zoned sleeping quarters include a vast master bedroom with a walk-in robe, ensuite and ceiling fan, 2nd and 3rd bedrooms with ceiling fans and a self-contained granny flat featuring a bedroom, lounge and kitchen.
In a location with a focus on active family living, this lush and leafy street has escape-to-the-country feels yet puts you in the easy vicinity of local shops, nature reserves and Redwood Park Primary School.
- Torrens title c.1983 split-level family home with hills views
- Double garage plus connected workshop and store room
- Three carpeted bedrooms with ceiling fans in the main residence
- Palatial primary suite with a fresh ensuite and walk-in robe
- 3rd bedroom includes a built-in robe
- L-shaped lounge and dining adjacent to kitchen
- Sparkling kitchen with brick feature walls, stainless appliances, pantry storage
- Family room or casual meals area opening to a brick-paved courtyard
- Bath, shower and separate w/c
- Spacious laundry
- Huge entertainer's alfresco, pitch-roofed and paved with leafy garden surrounds
- Established easy-care garden beds
- Solar panels
- Ducted air conditioning
- Walk to Redwood Park Primary School
- Short drive to Tea Tree Plaza and Waterworld Aquatic Centre
RLA 285309
Listing description written by Eric Jem, Belle Property Norwood — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.
Also look at
17 Catherine Dr, Redwood Park SA 5097
4-bed house for sale. Asking $790K–$840K.
12 Sunhaven Rd, Redwood Park SA 5097
3-bed house for sale. Asking $7.5M.
285 Grenfell Rd, Redwood Park SA 5097
4-bed house. Currently listed.
29 Landal Blvd, Redwood Park SA 5097
3-bed house for sale. Asking $7M.