Royal Park at a glance
3,631
People
$890,000
Median sale
$596/wk
Median rent
3.48%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 27 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
SA › Royal Park › James St
3
Bedrooms
1
Bathrooms
2
Car spaces
570 m²
Land
256 m²
Building
Districts View
No upside evidence detected in the data Districts holds for this lot.
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
No recorded sale price for this property yet.
Local land rate: recorded House sales in Royal Park (last 5 years) with land size have a median of $1,870/m² of land (n=58). Districts calculation from recorded sales — not a valuation.
Royal Park at a glance
3,631
People
$890,000
Median sale
$596/wk
Median rent
3.48%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 27 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Planning
Planning data is being calculated
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
SAPlanning layers have not been retrieved for this property yet. A suburb median or growth rate is not a reason this particular lot would outperform. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Official flood overlay has not been retrieved (pending). Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $596/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
1 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
UnknownPlanning layers have not been retrieved for this property yet.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
UnknownThe constraint stack has not been retrieved for this lot, so Districts cannot explain a discount versus land size.
Lot-level flood
UnknownOfficial flood overlay has not been retrieved (pending). Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownDevelopment applications have not been queried for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Royal Park at a glance
3,631
People
$890,000
Median sale
$596/wk
Median rent
3.48%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 27 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Ray White GrangeThis mid fifties' Royal Park residence teams up with first home buyers, investors, family buyers and developers (STCC) to exceed expectations and make dreams come true.
A bright and shiny example of low-key family living, this three bedroom cutie basks in happy home vibes and crispy-fresh presentation. While initial impressions are of a compact home, with the generous floorplan and loads of room on the 570sqm block (approx.) to extend, there is a rosy glow about its future prospects.
Along with character elements such as ceiling roses and ornate cornices, timber floorboards add a luxuriously cosy ambience to three airy bedrooms, a spacious lounge and a large and lively eat-in kitchen. The bathroom, kitchen and laundry are also fabulously functional and well-equipped to handle bustling family life.
Of the three big and comfy bedrooms two feature built-in robes and two include ceiling fans along with ducted a/c for blissful summer night sleeping. The back garden-facing sunroom invites loads of natural light making it a great home office, or perhaps a sunny playroom or home gym.
Lots more to love:
• Built in 1955, well maintained and updated over the years
• Perfect first home, investment, family home, renovation or development project (STCC)
• Back-to-back single garages and a separate storage shed
• A manicured backyard with fruit trees and lawn for the kids to play
• Expansive undercover outdoor entertaining area
• Ducted evaporative air conditioning and ceiling fans
• Generous lounge room
• Spacious kitchen/dining with a ceiling fan, dishwasher, gas cooktop
• Neutral bathroom, bath and shower, separate w/c
• Generous laundry with built-in storage
• Just 600m to Hendon Primary School
• Zoned Seaton High School (1.2km)
Superbly located near local reserves, eateries and public transport, this lovely home is also a short drive from West Lakes, Tennyson beach and Westfield West Lakes Shopping Centre.
Disclaimer: As much as we aimed to have all details represented within this advertisement be true and correct, it is the buyer/ purchaser's responsibility to complete the correct due diligence while viewing and purchasing the property throughout the active campaign.
Property Details:
Council | CHARLES STURT
Zone | GN - General Neighbourhood
Land | 570sqm(Approx.)
House | 256sqm(Approx.)
Built | 1955
Council Rates | $TBC pa
Water | $TBC pq
ESL | $TBC pa
Listing description written by Phil Tropeano, Ray White Grange — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.