Ravenswood at a glance
3,950
People
$451,000
Median sale
$402/wk
Median rent
4.64%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 15 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
TAS › Ravenswood › Prossers Forest Rd
$280,000
Last sold
4 Mar 2021
3
Bedrooms
1
Bathrooms
0
Car spaces
612 m²
Land
102 m²
Building
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$280,000
4 Mar 2021 · derived via latest_sale
Local land rate: recorded House sales in Ravenswood (last 5 years) with land size have a median of $528/m² of land (n=104). Districts calculation from recorded sales — not a valuation.
Ravenswood at a glance
3,950
People
$451,000
Median sale
$402/wk
Median rent
4.64%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 15 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs Ravenswood
-37.9%
Median sale
Suburb $451,000
+2.83 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 4.64%
Suburb median $451,000 from 15 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning data is being calculated
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
TASPlanning layers have not been retrieved for this property yet. A suburb median or growth rate is not a reason this particular lot would outperform. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Official flood overlay has not been retrieved (pending). Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Nearby development applications are not loaded for this property.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $402/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms. No recorded off-street parking — often a discount versus the suburb median for the same beds.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded for this property. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
1 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
UnknownPlanning layers have not been retrieved for this property yet.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded for this property.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
UnknownThe constraint stack has not been retrieved for this lot, so Districts cannot explain a discount versus land size.
Lot-level flood
UnknownOfficial flood overlay has not been retrieved (pending). Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownDevelopment applications have not been queried for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Ravenswood at a glance
3,950
People
$451,000
Median sale
$402/wk
Median rent
4.64%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 15 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by The Agency | Tasmania RentalsDon't delay in arranging an inspection of this immaculate three bedroom brick residence, as you'll run the risk of missing out on a wonderful opportunity to purchase your first home.
Totally rewired, insulated and with absolutely nothing to do but move on in, you will be immediately impressed with the presentation of this lovely property. With an open plan layout, the living, dining and kitchen are easily kept comfortable year round with an inverter heat-pump that also distributes heating and cooling to the nearby hallway and up the brief stairway to the bedrooms.
All window coverings have been updated throughout with new floor tiling installed in the bathroom, laundry and renovated kitchen, boasting quality stainless steel appliances, new benchtops and joinery as well as a large pantry. The modern and tasteful bathroom enjoys stylish tapware and fittings as well as the convenience of a separate toilet. All three bedrooms have good sized built in robes, additional shelving in bedrooms two and three and an over-sized linen cupboard in the entry provides terrific additional storage.
With renewed fencing, the gently sloped enclosed rear yard has been nicely landscaped and boasts a paved and shaded BBQ area, ideal for entertaining guests in the warmer months. The backyard receives lovely day-long sunshine and is perfect for children and pets with a cute cubby house, plenty of space and useful outdoor storage with a handy garden shed, powered under-house access and off street parking for at least four vehicles.
With little passing traffic, the home is located on a no-through road and conveniently just minutes away from the local supermarket, primary school and family day care centre and only a quick five minute drive into the Launceston CBD.
Best to call soon to arrange your viewing - I look forward to showing you through!
Council Rates:
Approximately $1200 per year
TasWater Rates: Approximately $1000 per year + usage
Bushby Property Group has no reason to doubt the accuracy of the information in this document which has been sourced from means which are considered reliable, however we cannot guarantee accuracy. Prospective purchasers are advised to carry out their own investigations.
Listing description written by Richard Bailey, The Agency | Tasmania Rentals — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.
Also look at