Seven Mile Beach at a glance
1,511
People
$1,175,000
Median sale
$609/wk
Median rent
2.70%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 6 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
TAS › Seven Mile Beach › Leyden Ave
$511,000
Last sold
19 Dec 2016
4
Bedrooms
2
Bathrooms
4
Car spaces
741 m²
Land
173 m²
Building
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$511,000
19 Dec 2016 · derived via latest_sale
Local land rate: recorded House sales in Seven Mile Beach (last 5 years) with land size have a median of $1,345/m² of land (n=19). Districts calculation from recorded sales — not a valuation.
Seven Mile Beach at a glance
1,511
People
$1,175,000
Median sale
$609/wk
Median rent
2.70%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 6 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs Seven Mile Beach
-56.5%
Median sale
Suburb $1,175,000
+3.50 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 2.70%
Suburb median $1,175,000 from 6 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning scheme
Clarence Local Provisions Schedule
Zone
Low Density Residential
107.10
Jurisdiction
Clarence
Clarence, TAS
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
TASZoned Low Density Residential · 107.10 (Clarence Local Provisions Schedule). Official parcel area about 751 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. Nearby development applications are not loaded for this property.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $609/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded for this property. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
3 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownmediumZoned Low Density Residential · 107.10 (Clarence Local Provisions Schedule). Official parcel area about 751 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded for this property.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumOfficial parcel about 751 m² — land size can look like optionality. No material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
Seven Mile Beach at a glance
1,511
People
$1,175,000
Median sale
$609/wk
Median rent
2.70%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 6 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by Petrusma Property Sandy BayThis exciting family home just a stroll from pristine Seven Mile Beach is a very rare find. Fully renovated throughout with absolutely stunning interiors and excellent outdoor areas to entertain family and friends.
A covered entry leads to the spacious central lounge and dining area with beautiful Tas Oak floors and Norseman wood heater. The adjoining kitchen is an advanced design with top end appliances and an island bench and breakfast bar, and both the lounge and kitchen have large sliding glass doors opening to a private deck area at the rear.
There are three dedicated bedrooms, the main with built-in wardrobes, and a stylish family bathroom with bath and separate shower. There is also a versatile rumpus room off the main living area that can just as easily be used as a large 4th bedroom as required. The separate laundry also has a shower and is often used as a second bathroom after a visit to the beach.
The property has lovely established gardens with a secure back yard for pets or kids play. There is plenty of off-street parking at front and the property is only 15-20 minutes to the Hobart CBD. An outstanding opportunity to enjoy a beach side lifestyle in comfort.
- Stunning family home near the beach
- Spacious living opening to large sundeck
- High end kitchen with quality appliances
- Versatile rumpus or 4th bedroom option
- Shower in laundry used as 2nd bathroom
Year Built: 1972
Construction: Brick Veneer
Heating: Norseman wood heater and Daikin heat pump
Listing description written by Sandy Bay Office, Petrusma Property Sandy Bay — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.
Also look at