St Agnes at a glance
4,189
People
$880,000
Median sale
$582/wk
Median rent
3.44%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 8 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
SA › St Agnes › Abercrombie Cres
$660,000
Last sold
17 Sept 2021
4
Bedrooms
2
Bathrooms
2
Car spaces
860 m²
Land
Districts View
No detected risks — but see the checklist: absence of evidence is not an all-clear.
Each line above is labelled. A fact is quoted from the named source, with its date. A calculation is worked out by Districts from those facts — you can check the arithmetic. An interpretation is Districts' opinion of what the evidence means, not a fact, a valuation, or advice. Anything we haven't retrieved yet is marked as missing rather than treated as a pass.
Price evidence
Last sold
$660,000
17 Sept 2021 · derived via latest_sale
Local land rate: recorded House sales in St Agnes (last 5 years) with land size have a median of $1,141/m² of land (n=51). Districts calculation from recorded sales — not a valuation.
St Agnes at a glance
4,189
People
$880,000
Median sale
$582/wk
Median rent
3.44%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 8 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Vs St Agnes
-25.0%
Median sale
Suburb $880,000
+1.15 pp
Gross yield
Suburb 3.44%
Suburb median $880,000 from 8 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation, not a portal figure.
Planning
Planning scheme
Planning and Design Code
Zone
General Neighbourhood
GN
Jurisdiction
Tea Tree Gully
Tea Tree Gully, SA
Data unavailable
Source
Planning facts are copied from official government GIS where available. Where an official property PDF exists (VicPlan, PlanBuild), Districts stores and serves that original document. Neither is a planning certificate, survey, or advice.
Site
Terrain has not been calculated for this property yet.
Slope is calculated on a projected metric grid from a public DEM clip of the official parcel. This is not a survey, engineering, or insurance assessment.
Flood exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Bushfire exposure has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Heritage listing has not been retrieved from any source for this property yet. Unknown is not the same as clear.
Records
Events are recorded observations from public listings, kept with their source and date. Missing values are shown as unknown, never estimated.
Capital growth
SAZoned General Neighbourhood · GN (Planning and Design Code). Official parcel area about 866 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate. Zoning and lot facts are a starting point, not proof this lot outperforms the suburb. Funded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
Flood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.” Street frontage and true lot geometry are not confirmed without open cadastre. Minimum lot size is not loaded, so two-lot subdivision is not confirmed. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Rental
No advertised rent is recorded. Suburb median rent $582/week — not this address. An inferred likely-rent range is not shown until official bond series are loaded for this dwelling type and bedrooms.
Current comparable rental listings within 400 m of this lot are not loaded. Nearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question. Supply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded. Suburb vacancy or leased-tape days are not this property’s competition.
Yield cannot be shown without both a price and a rent figure. Net yield is not estimated from gross advertising copy. Net yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Verdict
Districts view
Not enough official evidence yet to underwrite this as an investment.
Detail
The same ten questions apply to every property. Missing flood, nearby DAs, achieved rents, or lot geometry is unknown — not “no.”
Do not treat a suburb median, an advertised yield, or a listing score as the case for this lot.
The evidence loaded so far isn't enough on its own to change a buy, offer, or walk-away decision for this property.
Evidence
Districts asks the same ten questions of every property. If one shows as unknown, that data isn't published for this state or hasn't been loaded yet — the question stays visible so you can see exactly what's missing.
3 of 10 questions answered so far
Development optionality of this lot
KnownlowZoned General Neighbourhood · GN (Planning and Design Code). Official parcel area about 866 m². Dual occupancy is not confirmed from the controls loaded for this lot. Two-lot subdivision is unknown without minimum lot size and frontage. This is a screen, not a planning certificate.
Nearby development pipeline
UnknownNearby development applications are not loaded. This lot’s own applications are a separate question.
Honest achievable rent
KnownlowThis is not “bond data says this address leases for $X.” The comparable figure is a suburb advertised/median rent, not this property. Official bond files (postcode or suburb × type × bedrooms) are not loaded yet.
Rental supply pressure
UnknownSupply pressure needs comparable listings near this lot plus a nearby DA pipeline. Neither is loaded.
Why is this cheap?
KnownmediumOfficial parcel about 866 m² — land size can look like optionality. No material overlays were returned that would explain a discount. That is not proof the price is fair. Nearby DAs, easements, and flood-layer gaps can still explain a cheap-looking listing — those are not all loaded.
Lot-level flood
UnknownFlood overlay has not been queried for this lot. Missing layer is unknown, not “no.”
Catalyst exposure
UnknownFunded catalyst catchments are not loaded. A TOD badge is not this product.
This lot's DA history
UnknownNo DA adapter returned applications for this parcel.
Statutory land value versus ask
UnknownStatutory land value is not available as free bulk data in this jurisdiction. Do not fake it with a suburb median.
Net yield / holding costs
UnknownNet yield / holding costs are not estimated outside NSW without inventing land tax.
Area
St Agnes at a glance
4,189
People
$880,000
Median sale
$582/wk
Median rent
3.44%
Suburb gross yield
Median sale from 8 recorded sales (last 12 months) — a Districts calculation.
Listing material
Listed by First National Real Estate Burton GrovesYou will love this beautifully presented family home built 1978, set on 860sqm lot (approx.) perfectly positioned amongst other quality homes on a quiet tree lined street that backs onto an extensive nature reserve with resident Koalas, yet ideally located to take advantage of excellent public transport and the benefits of local shopping, schools and the ever-popular Tea Tree Plaza & Modbury Hospital that's just a short distance away.
From the moment you arrive, you will appreciate the love and attention that this home has been given, from the low maintenance fully established gardens, with outside entertaining, to every corner of the home that you could call your own!
The home has just been painted from top to bottom, inside and outside, new carpets, new curtains and so much more.
The home features...
Four bedrooms with built in robes.
Two modern bathrooms
Formal lounge/formal dining
Beautiful solid wood kitchen plus dishwasher.
Casual meals
Polished Floorboards
Double carport plus double detached garage with side access
Sparkling fully fenced in ground pool
Large back garden ample room for children
Veranda for all your outdoor entertaining.
The home is beautifully presented, this one will not last five mins on the market.
Listing description written by Kim Henley, First National Real Estate Burton Groves — reproduced as published, not verified by Districts.